McDonald's Hearing Continued Until April
After three hours of testimony, the Zoning Hearing Board continued an application by McDonald's for a variance.
After three hours of testimony, the Zoning Hearing Board on Thursday continued an application from McDonald's for a variance. The hearing will resume during a special Zoning Hearing Board meeting on April 12 at 7:30 p.m. The meeting will take place at the township Administration Building.
McDonald’s is seeking zoning relief to exceed the driveway aisle width requirement for a 3,911 square-foot restaurant it hopes to build in the Village at Newtown Shopping Center. McDonald's is proposing to demolish a 6,000 square foot building adjacent to Wells Fargo Bank and construct a 58-seat restaurant with drive-through window.
The township’s ordinance requires all cart ways to be a minimum of 25 feet in width. McDonald’s needs a variance because it is seeking to construct a drive-through window aisle that’s 18 feet wide in some areas.
At the recommendation of the township’s Planning Commission, the township sent lawyer John Koopman in opposition to the proposal. Four residents also sought party status, including Fran Poole, president of the Cliveden Homeowners Association. Poole received party status on behalf of himself and the association. People with party status can cross examine witnesses and present evidence.
The majority of the hearing consisted of testimony from Michael Jeitner, an engineer hired on behalf of McDonald’s. Jeitner testified that the narrow aisle, which would be a one-way drive through, is the preferred size and configuration for the design.
A crowd of about 40 people turned out, but as the hour wore on, attendance began to dwindle. There was an opportunity for public comment, however no residents chose to speak.
There will be another opportunity for public comment at the April meeting.
Newtownian
10:52 am on Friday, March 2, 2012
We need a Trader Joe's, Whole Foods, etc. Not a poor quality fast food item. We must rise to our local paid off representatives and get what we want, not select businessmen who own the local politicians.
2013
11:42 pm on Friday, March 2, 2012
Get with the program, ED !
Hank
12:05 pm on Friday, March 2, 2012
Nothing against McDonald's, but this is the wrong location. Find a spot that doesn't need a variance, for starters.
the VOICE
8:59 am on Sunday, March 4, 2012
Newtown needs a McDonalds !
Renee
10:40 am on Sunday, September 30, 2012
No we don't
Efrancisco Sengutto
3:18 pm on Sunday, March 4, 2012
(Seemed there was an error while posting this comment):
I agree with Hank. Not disputing a company's general right to operate, but this is the *wrong* location for a McD's. "Not in my backyard", literally!
To clarify Kara's article:
- Besides the parties to the hearing, in attendance there was a group of residents, and a group of people wearing red McDonald's t-shirts. I suppose they *could* have been residents, but I didn't recognize any of them.
- "no residents chose to speak" because at the first break it was announced that the hearing would be continued, at which point public comment would be allowed.
- "as the hour wore on" - more like three hours!
Renee
10:42 am on Sunday, September 30, 2012
Had I known about the meeting My husband and I would have attended and spoke up with regard to disapproval of McDonalds in our community.
Efrancisco Sengutto
3:22 pm on Sunday, March 4, 2012
So, I wonder aloud who the McD's supporters were? Other franchise operators (owner/operators)? Corporate reps? Prospective employees at this location?
They did sit very patiently and quietly hour after hour..
If they were there to give public comment, it seems their only purpose was to counter the residents - in the sense of drown them out. I state this because: while most of the residents left at the break when the continuance was announced, most of the McD's reps stayed. At the end of this first session of the hearing, the solicitor DID offer anyone a chance to comment at that time (even given the continuance) - but none of the McD's reps did so. If they do comment at the next session, then they are obviously there to simply counter the residents, or intimidate them, or whatever.
The interesting thing is that the McD's reps are even there. No one is disputing McD's right to operate in general. At the end the applicant's attorney thanked the McD's folks for showing support. Why would he have to?
None of the red-shirted McD's reps claimed party status.
I think this is a matter between the applicant, and the residents in whose backyards this fast food with drive-thru would fall.
At a prior meeting before the Township some McD's supporters mentioned McD's support for Ronald McDonald House, support of Little League, etc. All fantastic! And all *totally irrelevant* to this zoning matter!
Man Landers
7:18 pm on Sunday, March 4, 2012
I had dinner at "Friends" on Friday around 5:00 and the lot was PACKED, even without a McDonalds. I can't imagine the volume of traffic a new McDonald's would add but it would cause me to avoid the area completely and I'll just get my dinner someplace else. Surely the zoning board would see the same if they drove bye. And that's the point; zoning regulations exist for a reason, to insure quality of life and that current business owners aren't hurt by inappropriate over-development. Let McDonald find another location in Newtown, just not here.
Renee
10:45 am on Sunday, September 30, 2012
There is one in Richboro that is not too far away, so why would we need one in Newtown in any location. There are too many restaurants as it is.
MR
8:49 am on Monday, March 5, 2012
Newtown does not "need" a McDonalds! This country has enough issues with unhealthy eating habits and obesity. Just recently McDonalds was called out for putting Ammonium Hydroxide (pink slime) in their food to decontaminate meat. Ammonium hydroxide is used throughout the fast-food industry as an anti-microbial agent so that otherwise “inedible meat” can be consumed. The chemical is also used in fertilizers, household cleaners, and homemade explosives. Their meat comes from so many different sources and parts of the animal who knows what you are eating- it's actually referred to as "scrap meat," the same quality used in dog food. Their fries are loaded with other chemicals, or "natural flavors," that make them taste the way they do. The lettuce that goes into their salads is sprayed with sugar and MSG. McDonalds is gross, unhealthy, and an unnecessary addition to Newtown! It's not food, it's poison.
the VOICE
12:18 am on Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Gee, I don't hear of people dying from eating that "poison"
'
ballister buster
7:55 pm on Tuesday, March 6, 2012
The meeting is whether to allow a variance to the drive thru width. Question, what size is chick filet and wendy's drive thru
Renee
10:46 am on Sunday, September 30, 2012
Chic-Fil-A and Wendy's should not be relevant to McDonald's
vcc33
7:44 am on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Why are we adding another fast food restaurant in the center of Newtown? Panera Bread and the Corner Bakery were options, now we are settling on this? Where are we, North East Philly, or Newtown? If you want to give yourself heart disease or gain more weight, supersize your Wendy's, a block away!
the VOICE
12:19 am on Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Why not ?
Renee
10:47 am on Sunday, September 30, 2012
Are we trying to make Newtown a city and push out the nice community and residence that exist?
Kara Seymour
10:27 am on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Corner Bakery has approval to utilize the former Blockbuster. The McDonald's is being proposed for a different site, a former medical office next to Wells Fargo.
MR
5:09 pm on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Newtown does not need a McDonald's- this is totally ridiculous!
the VOICE
12:20 am on Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Why not ?