Opinion: Bucks Legislators Should be Ashamed
The recently approved Marcellus Shale bill strips municipalities of power to protect their people, says the Bucks County Sierra Club.
We are so disappointed in Bucks legislators, Senators Chuck McIlhinney, Bob Mensch and Tommy Tomlinson as well as Representatives Gene DiGirolamo, Paul Clymer, Frank Farry, Bernie O'Neill, Scott Petri, Marguerite Quinn and Kathy Watson for voting in favor of H.B. 1950.
This dangerous Marcellus gas drilling bill is disguised as an "impact fee" bill, but is filled with more loopholes for drillers than benefits to Pennsylvania. This bill is now on Gov. Tom Corbett's desk to be signed.
The legislators and the Corbett administration negotiated this bill behind closed doors and presented it to the House and Senate without time for legislators and the public to review its contents or comment about it. To say that this is bipartisan legislation is a mockery.
The bill rewrites the PA drilling laws and adds several new dangerous provisions, including provisions allowing all types of gas operations in all zoning districts; residential areas, schools, parks, hospitals, and sensitive natural and cultural areas.
This means people in Bucks County or nearby counties may be forced to live as little as 300 feet away from gas well pads, open frack pits, compressor stations or pipelines, despite evidence such development causes pollution, damages health, and lowers property values.
The bill also prevents municipalities from adopting zoning provisions that are stricter than the weak, mandated standards. Municipalities will no longer be able to play a central role in protecting the health, safety, and welfare of residents from the oil and gas industry.
Pennsylvania voters will remember who exposed the public to pollution and harm at election time and vote for legislators who will protect the citizens.
Sincerely,
David Meiser
Chair, Bucks County Sierra Club Conservation Committee
Jim Donovan
1:14 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
You're right, David. They should be ashamed. Unfortunately, the only way politicians know how to get money is to either raise taxes or sell out to big business. This has to stop. Government needs to cut costs where possible and, more importantly, uncover ways to produce income in some other way(s).
I brought this up to Sen. Mensch at a meeting Rep. Quinn had recently and you'd have thought I was speaking a language from Pluto. In his favor, he was at least open to the idea.
I contend that there is a way, if people are committed to producing a result. I'm in if someone wants to set up a brainstorming session. There must be better ways to raise money than sell out our children's future for a decent environmental.
Elaine Skurno
1:55 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
We MUST enact Term Limits for ALL political ofices (elective and appointees) and STOP THE CORRUPTION>
LA
3:17 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I'm with you on Term Limits for all political offices. Political office was never meant to be a lifetime position; was meant to be for a short time, then you go back to your civilian life.
It's the only way to stop the corruption, greed and selling out of our country, states and communities. I don't know about everyone else, but I am thoroughly sick of these greedy, corrupt people, who are NOT serving "we the people."
Jeff Lugar
9:00 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Their term limit is voting them out if they do a bad job; if someone does a good job, why would you want to get rid of them?
Wendy Saddler
3:07 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I thoroughly agree with Elaine. We need to enact term limits for ALL political offices, and STOP THE CORRUPTION ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE. I firmly believe that it begins with holding our local government officials accountable for their misdeeds, and going to the county on up. I would say this regardless of whichever party seems to be in control, and believe that anyone (R or D) who commits anything illegal and/or immoral needs to go.
Eric S
5:43 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Soap box, ballot box, jury box and ammo box......use in that order. And no, I'm not advocating the use of violence, but we do have a responsibility to oust our leadership when they become corrupt. The last one is meant to ensure the first three are usable and enforcible.
Robert Post
7:54 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I am pleased that legislation facilitating the development of natural gas resources in the Marcellus Shale has been passed. I may not like all the particulars; time will tell. But the Environmental lobby has chosen recently to go for the jugular on issues like this, hoping to block development outright, rather than cooperating with legislators and the industry to insure that the best legislative outcome. We all lose that way: Blaming the legislators is outrageous..This new resource offers just what is needed in 21st Century America: increased energy independence, jobs to cut unemployment costs and bolster tax revenues. It was going to come to fruition, as it should. Trying to block it outright was short-sighted and narrow-minded.
Same thing's going on with the Keystone XL pipeline which would bring oil down from Canada (and the new oil from the Baaken Formation in the Dakotas) to the US Gulf Coast, which has the largest concentration of petrochemical industry in the world. The New York Times reported that the Sierra .Club fought against this pipeline not because of local environmental issues inside America --- they wanted to stop expansion of Canada's tar sands development. Canada said, in effect: "No problem. We'll sell it to the Chinese." So far, on the XL Pipeline, Sierra Club's made sure America gets none of the benefits hoped for (jobs, lower oil costs, more volume in the petrochemical industry) WITHOUT accomplishing their own agenda!.
Shame on Sierra Club!
Blue Skies
7:23 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Robert Post I don't know who you are but I agree with you. People are simply not being informed properly. All these clubs have their own agenda and the people hear their ideas without hearing what is truly going on. This is incredible for Pennsylvania, Ohio and beyond, so many jobs are being formed and we are going to be able to supply our own resources withouth having to rely on foreign sources. This is a win win. The Not In My Backyard idea is rediculous especially because the Marcellus Shale isn't in Bucks County and the gas drillers are not fracking the Delaware. This is NOT Gasland the movie. It is time for all of us to really be informed of what is truly happening for our great state and not from the environmenal clubs that have an agenda!
Robert Post
2:13 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Exactly! It's great encouragement when your viewpoint finds ears that can hear.
(Who am I? Just a pretty much life-long resident of Northampton Township whose family has been here for a century. And a mostly-retired engineer who really thinks we could do a better job if all stakeholders were committed to getting the best solutions to problems. There are ways to facilitate that... but they do NOT involve "politics as usual." (Along the lines of what Jim Donovan was getting at in the first comment...)
Jeff Lugar
9:04 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
The thing is, NIMBYism demands municipalities be restrained a bit, because everyone thinks, "sure, go get the energy... just don't do it near me." If it were left solely up to them, whole massive swaths of area would be unavailable for getting at the shale. Getting at underground energy sources is never easy or pretty, but it is a necessary evil.
Maggie Velek
9:32 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
We need energy! Our own State is plentiful with this natural resource. We our wasting our own resource in Pennsylvania. PGW/PECO has lines running underneath our world forever. We need to use our own sources in our backyard and stop depending on others, who Really care nothing for us. There are mandates to protect us, read the Bill. Be informed, Do You Really know what its about? Is it really a bad Bill or is just the Green Do Good Gooders who are againt everything?! Their solutions are just not progessed or do-able in this economy. Do your homework people!!
Robert Post
2:15 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
They meed to put a "like" button on this thing, like facebook. Maggie's comment is right on the money!
Ellen
10:51 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
If the drilling helped fund education and restore services in PA, I might be for it. But PA is not taxing drillers like other states. Many jobs drilling brings are temporary and low paying. States that tax drilling have state universities with affordable tuition. Normal families can't afford Penn State tuition, about 29k a year with room and board. I would also be for drilling if there was energy independence. I don't think we need more wars over oil. But gas companies don't care about energy independence. They are lining up buyers in India and China. Those countries are growing fast and pay top dollar for energy. Energy independence is a myth. Have any of you read about the contaminated water in parts of PA where drilling is underway? There are not enough inspectors to keep track of drillers. The state might have rules but they're no good if there aren't people to enforce them. Also,water treatment is not 100% successful. Our water treatment plants can't remove fracking chemicals. The drilling companies are leasing our public land. State forests preserved over a hundred years ago for the use of all Pennsylvanians are being cut down for roads for trucks and drilling rigs. I have looked at the bill. Drilling will damage PA, economically and environmentally. When the gas runs out the tax-payers will be left holding the bag.
LA
11:33 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
@Jeff Luger
Most politicians can/will be corrupted by power/inflluence and the perqs that go along with that power. Term limits can control the amount of trouble any politician can get into. If they aren't concentrating on getting re-elected, then maybe they can concentrate on doing the peoples' business and not spend so much time worrying about their own.
Jeff Lugar
7:12 am on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
I don't know what figures you have, but I suspect "most politicians" are not corrupt and won't become corrupt. Otherwise there'd be a lot more corruption trials.
Anyway, the comment I responded to felt like it was saying 'I don't agree with what the politicians did, so it must be corruption,' even though the opinion article never once mentions corruption.
Larry Foy
12:11 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Some of the people here seem a little misinformed as if they read ONE article and made their mind up from that. Most of those politicians mentioned don't know much about simple things let alone very involved things like gas drilling in PA! Well Drillers , Frackers ,Directional Drillers and land owners are all making GREAT money.Sad thing is they can't find people to weld,dig and lay pipe to start to run OUR gas.Americans have this thing now about going out and getting a job where you have to" work" to get paid vs texting and email and shuffle papers in the service industry to get a paycheck.We have the richest poor people in America..
The gas will be used here not shipped abroad.The gas companies should be forced to present all chemicals used to frack and be held to water treatment.(sounds good)
David Meiser
12:38 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Robert Post
First the issues are as follows
The the legislation was a typical backroom deal with no public input, some legislators did not get the 200page final wording until an hour before the final vote
In addition:
1) This drilling bill adopts one of the nation’s lowest extraction fees.
2) Contains weak and watered-down environmental protections over drinking water and our streams and wetlands,
3) Confers special rights on the drillers over other businesses in Pennsylvania,
4) Destroys local communities’ rights to use zoning ordinances to protect homes, hospitals, schools, and other areas from drilling damage and withholds funds from any municipality that attempts to use those rights.
You try and divert attention from THIS issue by trying to bring up the Keystone XL (another boondoggle in itself)
The facts of the matter is this bill was NOT in the interests of the citizens of PA but for the benefit of the Gas drilling industry, Gov Corbett's biggest political contributor!
B
David Meiser
12:43 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Larry Foy
you are wrong about this gas being used domestically, currently Dominion Resources Inc. is seeking permits to export liquefied natural gas from a terminal near Cove Point, Md. This LNG port is specifically for marcellus shale gas exporation.
Robert Post
2:29 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Seeking permits is a LONG way from certain export, especially when you are talking LNG terminals.There are risks in such operations that make permits quite difficult to secure. How many of them have been approved and are in operation in the USA? Besides, the current futures prices for natural gas (below $3/1000 cft) would NOT seem to be high enough to support an LNG export business. So Larry Foy is NOT "wrong," per se.
(I will help you along rather than letting this sound like innuendo: there are only 12 LNG IMPORT terminals nationwide. There is ONE export terminal, in Alaska. http://www.lngfacts.org/LNG-Today/Import-Terminals.asp )
Patrick C
10:27 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
Robert, did you miss the link to the paragraph about exporting, it said that with the exploitation of the shale they are putting a lot of effort into allowing more exports. The weird part is I've seen the ships that they use for transporting according to the site, in the lower Delaware yet there are not facilities? Strange or are they not listing some?
David Meiser
2:52 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Dominion, based in Richmond, Va., has won approval from the Department of Energy to use Cove Point for exporting liquefied natural gas to about 20 nations with which the United States has free-trade agreements. The company is now seeking federal permission to allow shipments to virtually any foreign country, except those barred because of trade embargoes.
http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2012-02-10/features/bs-gr-gas-export-20120210_1_fracking-fluids-shale-gas-gas-exports
Maria
3:35 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/how_fracking_works_cKSUVaVvWedFdqfvNQ2q7H
Fracking fears are based on ignorance. Frack here and frack now!
Maria
3:37 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/coal-oil-gas/top-10-myths-about-natural-gas-drilling-6386593#slide-1
Every dollar spent on Muslim Saudi oil is a dollar invested into the Islamization of America by their building of mosques preaching sedition and hate. Frack here and frack now.
Get the facts -- ot the envrionmental hype!
David Meiser
3:52 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Dr. Anthony Ingraffea is the Dwight C. Baum Professor of Engineering and Faculty Fellow at the David R. Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future (ACSF) at Cornell University.
The trouble with the industry’s PR is that it’s built on myths.
Myths always have at least a kernel of truth, but you have to listen to the whole story, carefully, not just the kernel.
And then ask questions about the myth. After years of deception, the whole natural gas story is starting to emerge, and engineers, plus scientists, physicians, generals, admirals, ranchers, farmers, landowners and regulators – including U.S. Environmental Protection Agency chief Lisa Jackson – are seeking answers to those questions.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2011/11/28/nb-f-shale-gas-anthony-ingraffea-122.html
David Meiser
3:55 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
"Every dollar spent on Muslim Saudi oil is a dollar invested into the Islamization of America by their building of mosques preaching sedition and hate"
WOW!!! your bigotry is showing!
Bruce Patin
4:01 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
It is obvious that:
1. We Pennsylvanians will not get any financial benefit from this. The taxes will not cover the damage.
2. We will not be getting any jobs benefit from this. The jobs offered pale in comparison to the jobs that would be created by more environmentally sensitive methods of producing energy.
3. We will not get any energy independence benefit from this. The gas is going to be sold to the highest bidder, the money is going into the hands of the 1%, and we will still be buying oil from the Middle East.
The money that is spent on us will be in the form of lawsuits by the drilling companies and/or defense of lawsuits against them, and propaganda by Fox News to get us to elect the politicians that are supported by the drilling.
MR
11:29 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
This legislation is a huge step backwards. It is clearly devised for the benefit of the big corporations and is disguised to appear as if it will provide some advantage to local municipalities. The gas will be sold to the highest bidder; it is entirely foolish to believe anything else. And the cost for us will be further reckless destruction and pollution of the environment.
Maria
6:38 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
WOW!!! your bigotry is showing!
David -- No, that's the truth. It's the stealth jihad. You have no idea, I'm sure. What do you know about Islam and Sharia Law? But shh. Keep your head in the sand. Don't look any further.
www.thereligionofpeace.com
www.citizenwarrior.com
www.jihadwatch.com
Patrick C
10:22 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
You are right that money from the Middle east oil industry is being used in terrorism, but the large majority of American oil comes from the America's it costs a lot of money to ship it here. That oil is being used by countries in Europe, Asia, and Africa. My issue is that Sharia law is no different from the laws in the Bible that have shown up in America before as Christian or moral laws, Prohabition, adultry, witchcraft, Blue Laws, and Sodomy Laws. These laws have failed here before or are being reversed. The sites you list are just political sites aimed at scaring you. Besides look at how much trouble us Atheists are causing now, do you think we'd be quiet?
David Meiser
7:09 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
you've Got To Be Taught
to Hate And Fear,
you've Got To Be Taught
from Year To Year,
it's Got To Be Drummed
in Your Dear Little Ear
you've Got To Be Carefully Taught.
you've Got To Be Taught To Be Afraid
of People Whose Eyes Are Oddly Made,
and People Whose Skin Is A Diff'rent Shade,
you've Got To Be Carefully Taught.
you've Got To Be Taught Before It's Too Late,
before You Are Six Or Seven Or Eight,
to Hate All The People Your Relatives Hate,
you've Got To Be Carefully Taught!
Robert Post
12:10 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
Surely the head of the Sierra Club in Bucks County can do something more relevant than quote lyrics from a Broadway musical (lyrics I have known by heart for half a century.) For that matter, I would think that even rising to Bernadette's bait and playing what amounts to the race card should be beneath you. The issue is natural gas development in Pennsylvania. Please stay focused.
Tom
12:09 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
I fail to understand why people are against drilling in pa. We obviously have a serious problem with unemployment and energy supplies. Isn't this a solution to both?
side note:
In the late 1800s PA was the 4th largest economy in the world. What changed? Outrageous taxes and fines placed on companies for environmental impact driving them out of the market. Wouldn't a better solution be to work with the companies and not against them?
Maria
12:25 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
Yes, Tom it would.
But don't believe that so-called "progressive-liberals" are forward thinking or open-minded.
They are blinded by their own misguided agenda.
Patrick C
6:04 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
Those big corporations needed coal to power their machinery, now they use electricity and oil which are more plentiful elsewhere. Steel was the last holdout before china offered slave labor to produce it.
Maria
12:22 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
First -- fracking is safe and drill here drilll now.
Second -- I strongly suggest you check out the sites I have posted here. The truth is scary, but there is nothing hateful or bigoted about it.
Saudi Arabia makes money off oil and builds mosques worldwide and exports their wahhabism (violent Islamic ideology) and sharia law. It's just facts.
The Saudis have also bought our most prestigious schools out by establishing Islamic centers.
Look further than your OWN NARROW IDEOLOGY.
Every dollar spent on foreign (Islamic) oil is a dollar spent to support terrorism.
The Keystone Pipeline must also go through.
Maggie Velek
1:01 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
It's seems to be half for and half against. You have to love America and our Freedom of Speech. So many seem to be againt Corporations. Food for Thought: Has a poor man ever given you a job? Just saying....
Patrick C
6:07 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
Yes, we the poor spend what little we have to buy stuff made by our fellow poor, it is just that the rich need to take their cut
Maria
1:25 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
http://www.islamist-watch.org/9192/cair-fight-against-pennsylvania-foreign-law-bill
This is about all our freedoms. It's not a right-left issue, no matter how hard the Left tries to cozy up with the Muslim Brotherhood which has vowed to "destroy America from within."
Maria
1:31 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/
One more for the raod. Sharia Law.
You need to know -- because it WILL AFFECT you.
It's not hate when you are just repeating what THEY are saying.
Peace.
http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/
MR
1:37 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
Corporations control all of the wealth and power and act on behalf of their own interests first. Most corporations do not care about the overall good-- they care about money. There are plenty of jobs that are not created by large corporations as there are many entrepreneurs who continue to support the creative spirit of this country. And, unfortunately, it is the smaller businesses that suffer in the wake of corporate control over the economy. It certainly would be better for everyone if we could all work together, but it will never happen. Ideals always have to be sacrificed. Why should we have to conform to the interests of big business when they would never conform to interests that do not suite them? Historically, big corporations do not work for the people. They have very little concern for environmentally related issues and the long term consequences of their actions. And when their destruction takes its toll and people are outraged, they simply throw more money at the issue to make it go away.
MR
1:50 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
Fracking is NOT safe:
In 2005, the Bush/ Cheney Energy Bill exempted natural gas drilling from the Safe Drinking Water Act. It exempts companies from disclosing the chemicals used during hydraulic fracturing. Essentially, the provision took the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) off the job. It is now commonly referred to as the Halliburton Loophole.
The average well is up to 8,000 feet deep. The depth of drinking water aquifers is about 1,000 feet. The problems typically stem from poor cement well casings that leak natural gas as well as fracking fluid into water wells.
Generally 1-8 million gallons of water may be used to frack a well. A well may be fracked up to 18 times.
For each frack, 80-300 tons of chemicals may be used. Presently, the natural gas industry does not have to disclose the chemicals used, but scientists have identified volatile organic compounds (VOCs) such as benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene.
Maria
2:12 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/how_fracking_works_cKSUVaVvWedFdqfvNQ2q7H
Dave Meiser
5:26 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
Robert Post
Yes it is easy to get sucked sidewise into trolls on the internet.
Even if you are for or against gas drilling the legislation the PA legislature drafted voted upon was done behind closed doors without public input, and was kept away from public and most legislators until about an hour before voting.
As stated today in the Philly inquirer the new law (awaiting Corbett's signature), stipulates that wells and pipelines must be permitted in every zoning district, including residential neighborhoods.
It also forbids communities from making drilling operations a "conditional" use, a zoning tool many communities already have employed. That allows communities to impose strict conditions on where and how the lines can be built.
It is estimated that the new law will immediately void as many as 200 local ordinances as illegally restrictive to the industry
Lastly the 300 foot buffer is not the scientifically acceptable buffer zone for environmental or health and safety reasons. If (god forbid) a blowout happens this is inadequate for control or containment of blowout fluid or adequate distance to prevent a gas fire from spreading due to the heat radiation from a well fire
The point being is that this was poorly crafted legislation with no input from the public and is typical of Harrisburg politics. The Bucks County delegation should not have allowed the "politics as usual" and stood up to their leadership on the principle.
Dave Meiser
5:29 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
by the way since I posted the article someone has been trying to preform a A denial-of-service attack on my ISP and on this site!
Maria
9:56 am on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
It seems to me that a lot of these posts against drilling our own gas are from ideological people (neo-Communists) who are simply so far LEFT the Soviet Union would have thought them to be right-wing extremists. Drill here, drill now!
Dave Meiser
11:31 am on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Nice ad-hominem attack there Bernadette
Maria
11:42 am on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Just calling a spade a spade.
Peace.
-30-
MR
11:13 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012
Or maybe some people in this community are just so far right that they are unable to separate their conservative beliefs from the reality of the situation. Anyone who goes around promoting hate and ignorance and saying things like "stealth jihad" and then signing their posts with "peace" as if they were truly promoting that cause is just plain foolish. I suppose these same people would vote for Sarah Palin too if she were running for office again.
kristin lauersen
10:07 am on Friday, February 17, 2012
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8a6R5I6S2Y
kristin lauersen
10:09 am on Friday, February 17, 2012
http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DZ-MGBsLD51w&h=DAQH6Fkit
kristin lauersen
10:11 am on Friday, February 17, 2012
when the drilling starts we'll put Bernadette's name at the top of the list - she won't mind that they drill in her backyard. hope she has health insurance....