patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Trailer Park Developer May Resubmit Townhome Plan

In a five-page letter to the township, County Builders said it would consider submitting a plan for 56 townhomes provided township officials agree to a series of conditions.

 

The developer proposing a controversial 56-pad trailer park at the Newtown Swim Club says it would reconsider building townhomes on the site—provided township officials agree to a series of conditions.

In a five-page letter to the township, the developer’s lawyer, John VanLuvanee, says County Builders would consider filing a second application for the site that consists of 56 townhomes—four more units than original townhome application that was not supported by the board.

The letter, dated March 19, goes on to say the second application for townhomes will only be submitted if officials agree to six conditions, including seven waivers of the township’s Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance.

Follow Newtown Patch on Facebook.

According to the letter, township officials must agree that County Builders can have the townhome plan and the mobile home plan pending simultaneously.  “The filing of the townhome application does not constitute and shall not be construed as a withdraw of the mobile home plan,” the letter states.

County Builders says it will only resubmit the townhome plan if the Board of Supervisors agrees ahead of time to grant seven waivers of the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance, including rules pertaining to street size, parking locations and dedicated open space. 

The letter states County Builders will only withdraw the mobile home plan if and when it receives final approval from the township for the 56-unit townhome development.

The Board of Supervisors will be discussing the letter and County Builder’s proposal at its next meeting, March 27 at 7:30 p.m.

The swim club is closing after this summer and owner David Platt is working with County Builders to create a residential development.

The application for a mobile home park was submitted in December after the Newtown Township Board of Supervisors voted 3-2 to send its solicitor to the Zoning Hearing Board to defend the township's zoning regulations with regards to County Builders' 52-townhome proposal. The townhome proposal required a variance because it exceeded the housing density permitted in that zoning district.

The trailer park proposal was met with resistance from neighboring communities

Since then, in response to the community’s outrage over the trailer park proposal, board member Matt Benchener said he would now support townhomes, which would give County Builders the support they need to move forward.

In response to the public outcry, township officials in January directed its solicitor to reach out to County Builders and see if it would reconsider the townhome plan.

Related links:

Related Topics: newtown trailer park

bobrodo

9:02 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Can board vote NO against both plans and not give in to those that try these tactics.

Reply

Charles Jorgensen

9:21 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

I believe the Board should respond to County Builders that we will immediately accept a townhome plan for 38 (or whatever their Original recommended amount was). If you continue to submit plans for any type of trailer park, this submittal will be subject to such extreme scrutiny and extreme re-submittal and legal delays to the point that it will likely not get approval for final construction for many, many years. I was a commercial builder in another state and if overwhelming public sentiment was against a project in that location, it was voted down by the planning board and that was the end of it, regardless of the whether it technically met the zoning guidelines.

Reply
Comment_arrow

NS

1:16 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Good idea, I am sick of developers running rough shod over municipalities.

Comment_arrow

2013

3:26 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Sounds like a good plan !

mitch

9:36 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Who saw this one coming...

Reply
Comment_arrow

2013

4:52 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

iT WAS ALL A BIG BLUFF BY PLATT !

Rose Stranahan

10:11 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

I hope the Board does NOT succumb to the demands of these bullies! Remember you are elected by a majority of the township to perform on behalf of the best interests of those residents. Kindly listen and do your job
.

Reply
Comment_arrow

NS

7:13 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

The Chairman is more concerned about his legal woes:
http://www.buckslocalnews.com/articles/2010/01/31/the_advance/news/doc4b65b8b96382d697350757.txt

And the other stooges are likely getting something for it.......who would vote yes to this strong arm tactic?????

jqp

10:12 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

this is BLACKMAIL plain and simple, and Newton residents need to back our leadership to say NO to BLACKMAIL. While a trailer park may seem distasteful to some, worse for all is a governing board that is susceptible to BLACKMAIL/mafioso tactics such as these. I will personally contribute thousands of dollars to new township board candidates who run against any supervisor caving into these BLACKMAIL tactics. I really hope our township board shows some backbone and enforces the LAW versus letting these blatant blackmail tactics prevail.

Reply

NS

10:27 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

This is ridiculous, let them put in the trailer park............it's just posturing on their part.
I hope all residents vote out any board member who has voted yes to allowing anything except what they legally are entitled to.

Reply

Rob Ciervo

10:56 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

I'm not running for re-election but one of my top pledges to the citizens of Newtown Township was NO rezoning for high density housing. Any board member who follows along with this "letter" is doing just that in my humble opinion.

Reply
Comment_arrow

NS

1:17 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

So let's get the word out and not vote for the imbeciles who voted to approve.

Comment_arrow

NS

9:07 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Rob, which two colleagues of yours caved??? Please let us know...

The Illuminati

11:46 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Then don't rezone Rob...let them build the trailer home park. You will really show them! The bottom line is the owner of the property is doing what he is allowed to do in his zoning area. Because you and your board members were too short sighted, dont blame the property owner for working within the rules that this board established.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Greg Czar

8:02 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

I agree with you completely. The board dropped the ball on several things during Mr. Ciervo's tenure it is adios do not let the door hit you on the way out. PS how the ball parks coming?

Comment_arrow

NS

1:18 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

They are not asking to build within the confines of the zoning, dimwit, they are asking for a variance.

Comment_arrow

2013

4:54 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

this "Board" did not establish those Rules ! Don't blame them !

Comment_arrow

NS

8:10 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

That's the point, they are not "working within the rules that this board established". Let them try to build the trailer park with the limited number of pads that the present zoning permits....there is not enough economic incentive. Are you still failing to grasp the concept "Illuminati"? Perhaps you should change your name to "Non-Enlightened"...

Gerry Couch

11:57 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

If he would come in good faith and negotiate it would be one thing but this kind of attempting to bully the board deserves one thing a No Vote! Then do everything within the limits of the law to make it difficult for him to build his trailer park. He is disrespecting our elected leaders!

Reply

Betsy Hunt

7:02 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Blackmail. Build your trailer park...it is within your rights. But our officials must NOT "bend" to succomb to the blatantly ridiculous childish tactics of this group of bullies...warning to the supervisors...if you do: you will be inviting more bullies to the party.
I say let them build their park with the fullest restrictions the zoning/building ordinances will allow. LET THERE BE NO RANSOM for this kidnapping!

Reply

mtm

7:08 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Newtown needs to immediately pass an ordinance stating that no trailers or mobile homes may be placed in the township that were manufactured prior to 2012. That way no ancient pieces of junk can be hauled into the new trailer park. Then give them their trailer park! I’m sure they’ll love being trailer park landlords. The whole thing should last about three years before they go bankrupt and a real developer buys it and builds something appropriate.

Reply

Nancy Gracia

7:54 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

I agree. This land use attorney is out for blood. BUILD the trailer park and as my adult son commented to me - Now he might be able to afford to finally move out!

Reply

pamela ann fitzpatrick

8:06 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

I would like to see constructive dialogue with respect and no anger.

Reply
Comment_arrow

WBK

8:43 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

I agree, there has been too much talking without enough listening. Constructive dialogue would helpful.

2013

3:10 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

There is No constructive Dialouge with Builders they want what they want regardless of Zonning or Ordinances. Platt is only trying to get his greedy hands on what will pay the most ! He never wanted to build a Trailer Park, cant make enough with that !
Now he comes back with more townhouses and 7 more variances.[ Lets see what the NIMBY Fools do now !

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Q

6:31 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

"Platt is only trying to get his greedy hands on what will pay the most !"

I don't understand why you keep bringing up Platt and greed. When does wanting to maximize your return on an investment make you greedy?

Comment_arrow

mtm

6:42 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

John Q - When you demand more than the law allows and act like a spoiled child when you're told "no".... That's when wanting to maximize your return on an investment makes you greedy.

Comment_arrow

John Q

6:52 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

He's never demanded more than the law allows, he submitted a request. Also, from what I understand it's his right by law to put a trailer park on his property if he wants to. He is using leverage, which doesn't make him a child but rather a smart business man. Honestly, he does not owe Newtown or their residents anything.

Nothing personal.

Comment_arrow

2013

7:41 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

John Q, U must be a Platt or a good freind of one, cause' U don't listen very well !

Comment_arrow

John Q

7:53 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Never even heard of Platt or his swim club until this development proposal was announced.

Please treasure this response. It's the last one you'll be getting from me. I learned that anyone who uses exclamation points after every sentence and personally attacks anyone who does not agree with their pov is not worth having open dialogue with.

I wish you the best in your future irrational ranting.

Comment_arrow

NS

8:20 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

@ John Q: Platt through the builders is asking for a variance, even under the trailer park plan because that plan is not economic under current zoning. I don't fault Platt for trying to get the most value for his land, but strong arm tactics should not be succumbed to by the board under any circumstances. And if he resorts to them like in this most recent letter, the township should try to block any development at all. TIT for TAT

Comment_arrow

John Q

9:15 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

@NS: Agree with your points and appreciate how you understand that Platt, like anyone else, would want the most money he could get out of his land. It will be interesting to see how the board responds to the variance requests. My guess is the reason that the developer requested so many is to give them bargaining room. They'll probably wind up conceding on half of them or so in order to get a deal done quickly.

Also agree that if they can't come to an agreement and are intent on building a mobile park the board should fight them tooth and nail, not because I personally oppose mobile parks (I live in Northampton Township, although not Newtown) but because the residents of Newtown strongly oppose it and that is who the board works for.

Comment_arrow

NS

9:23 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

@ John Q: that is a lucid and well thought out statement. I also applaud you for appealing to Newtown residents to stand up and fight for what they want for their township!

Nancy_B

3:57 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

It is all about who knows who and who is getting something in return and that will absolutely be happening. It takes huge attendance at not only the Board of Supervisors meeting but also the Planning Commission, where it all starts. How very sad.

Reply
Comment_arrow

NS

4:07 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

So make sure your voice is heard at the next meeting everyone!!!

Newtown Guy

8:51 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

I do not like the idea of the traier park but I do not blame the builder. I blame the supervisors who were not willing to talk. He had no choice but to bring in the trailer park conversation. Now he realizes they might make more money with trailers so he says SCREW Ciervo and the town that turned there back on him with the NAC and his initial proposal. A respectful line if communication from the supervisors would have avoided this mess.

Reply
Comment_arrow

NS

9:05 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

That is a farce. He could have proceeded with either plan as long as he did not seek variances. You are insane if you think he can realize the full economic value of the land with a trailer park. They are using that as a threat, and the township's response should be to let them go through the process of applying for that permit. The supervisor's have been negligent in even considering a variance, and those who did should be removed from office. Can anyone offer their names to the public so they can be admonished in a public forum?

Newtown Guy

10:46 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

So @NS you would prefer a mobile home park? If you were at all in tune with real estate single homes in Newtown has been dead till about two weeks ago.

The valuation over time would be very close for town homes verse mobile homes. There is something to be said for providing your heirs residual income. Monthly rent from each trailer pad would be a great way over time to provide that residual income. I do believe any townhomes would require a variance. (Not 100% sure of that) So now Platt sees blood in the water and he is going for the kill by trying for additional townhomes. The supervisors should have never fell into his trap.

I think the two who initially voted to work with the property owner was the Gallaghers. They should be tarred and feathered... And then re-elected.

Reply
Comment_arrow

NS

6:41 am on Friday, March 22, 2013

The mobile park threat is only that, let them posture and due their due diligence and submit a proposal after they have spent a lot of development money. Then the township can shoot it down. :)

TJ

11:00 am on Sunday, March 24, 2013

This is basically a high stakes poker game. The guy with the highest amount of chips (developer) is the bully and can push around and bluff the guys with the short stack (the Township). In this case the Townhsip holds the better hand ( zoning laws) and the developer is holding the chips and wants to bluff to win the big pot. I say read the "tells" and the township call the bluff. We will then see if the big chip developer folds his hand and if he does whatever he submits must meet all strignet reviews to meet the letter of the law with NO variants. I think the majority of township residents do not want to see the Township fold its hand on this issue.

Reply

Chris

5:45 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

Do not want a trailer park in Newtown - period. There are already trailer parks in Levittown, Bristol, and elsewhere. Go pound sand mr developer, and twp board should step back and enable townhouses, but a maximum number more aligned with high value townhouse properties that already exist in close proximity. Build 'good stuff' or go away!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

TJ

7:46 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

I guess since we got rid of the cow farms and other farms that made up this community for hundreds of years some "New" people in mega mansions cannot stand the thought of affordable trailer homes.that are permitted by code. NIMBY, The horror!

Chris

10:01 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

Newtown is a fine town, made up of hard working people, some of whom have like myself, been here 3 decades. TJ, you seem to be focused on the divisive 1% rhetoric which doesn't mean squat in this discussion. Go peddle your divisive rhetoric at an occupy wall street rally.

Reply
Comment_arrow

TJ

8:48 am on Monday, March 25, 2013

You seem to be peddling the rhetoric and prefer that the developer dictate to the BOS what they want with numerous concessions and also fallback positions. I have worked on numerous developments from small residential to mega shopping and corporate centers and know that the towns holds the cards if they play them right. You must live very close to the proposed site and are a NIMBY. See what happened to McDonalds when push came to shove.The town needs to put them throught the wringer.

Rob Ciervo

11:11 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

Good assessment TJ. I don't bluff nor do I fold. Just ask Orleans...

Reply

Rob Ciervo

11:12 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

...or the Newtown Water Company, or McDonalds, or Beneficial Bank, etc...

Reply

Wilbur

7:49 am on Monday, March 25, 2013

If you know anything about the inside politics of this matter - then you should know to follow the money. Drunken Mike and his two flunkies, Ryan G. and ball-less Benchener, have gotten their orders from the County. County Builders and Greedy Platt are big contributors to the GOP. Drunken Mike needs money for re-election so he can abuse more policemen. It all comes down to MONEY... Platt greedy for it and Drunken Mike needing it.....

Reply

Leave a comment